Window analysis as a mechanism to avoid or pursue a delay claim in construction

  • by Steven Ellison
  • 22 Jan, 2019

The best approach for a contractor in avoiding a claim or demonstrating a delay is to simply keep clear records of any issues or events as they develop. Site diaries, timesheets or photographs may all be important evidence of a contractor’s entitlement to loss and expense.

The Society of Construction Law's Delay and Disruption Protocol at Paragraph 17.1 of the second edition reinforces the need for accurate records. If accurate and complete records are maintained, the causal link between an employer risk event and the resultant loss suffered should be able to be established, without the need to make a global claim.

Window analysis can then be used to identify the project critical path by dividing the project into useful time slices or windows of typically monthly periods. Time impact analysis can update the planned programme and then ‘impact’ it with any delay events, ideally evidenced by contemporaneous records. Delay analysis can then be applied to each time slice to determine the cause of the delays and highlight any concurrency.

Utilising time windows helps delay analysis especially on large or complex projects. This can help in the determination of a dispute by identifying and explaining the impact of any delays.  Each time slice identifies the planned practical completion date at the start and end of the period, along with the actual critical path. The analysis highlights any critical delay or acceleration during the time slice. Whilst the windows together chart the project from start to finish on a "real time" basis.

When determining a dispute, the courts will seek wherever possible to reject the concept of theoretical delay and seek evidence of specific events which result in delay. Window analysis provides a technique for organising and analysing project delays. This allows a party to successfully present detailed information in a coherent and evidenced claim, satisfying the requirements of a successful concurrent delay claim and where appropriate potentially avoiding the need for a global claim.

As part of our Management Consultancy services Vinco London Consulting help construction businesses and trade subcontractors build and develop systems based on sound business practices. Improving business performance to navigate the tricky commercial issues that can arise.


Contact us for further information we would love to hear from you

Telephone: 0207 183 7722
www.vincolondon.co.uk/contact-us 


by Steven Ellison 29 January 2019
Alternative Dispute Resolution in construction
by Steven Ellison 23 January 2019
How to Leverage your Employer Brand when recruiting and interviewing your future employees
by Steven Ellison 23 January 2019
The history and development of statutory adjudication as ameans of resolving UK construction disputes
by Steven Ellison 21 January 2019
The concept of Global Claims in relation to Construction Contracts.
by Steven Ellison 21 January 2019
The concept of Concurrent Delay in construction contracts.
by Steven Ellison 21 January 2019
Steven Ellison, Vinco London Consulting, examines the judgment in the case of Taylor Woodrow Holdings v Barnes & Elliott Ltd in which the Queens Bench Division considered the thorny issue of Liquidated damages being void for uncertainty
by Steven Ellison 21 January 2019
How to Leverage your Employer Brand when recruiting and interviewing your future employees